Hiking in Rosengarten in South Tyrol

October 30th, 2016 by Simon No comments »

At 1.834m above sea on the summit of the Völseggspitze (Monte Balzo)


EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/200 s – f/8 – 8 mm

Rosengarten group seen from Wuhnleger Weiher (Wuhnleger pond)


EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/60 s – f/13 – 16 mm

Path to the Hanicker Schwaige alpine hut at 1.904m


EOS 7D – ISO200 – 1/200 s – f/8 – 8 mm



EOS 7D – ISO200 – 1/320 s – f/4 – 150 mm


Powershot G7Xmk2 – ISO125 – 1/320 s – f/2.8 – 12.7 mm


EOS 7D – ISO200 – 1/800 s – f/5 – 200 mm


EOS 7D – ISO1250 – 30 s – f/5 – 8 mm


October 2nd, 2016 by Simon No comments »

Almost exactly 10 years ago I got my first DSLR camera and one of the very first images I took was lightning during a massive thunderstorm.

After that I never had the chance again – until a few days ago. The rain was not too bad and the sight was ideal.


EOS 7D – ISO100 – 20 s – f/11 – 18 mm

I suspect the many little black spots result from the combination of rain with the extremely bright flash. If there was a dust issue it would not be so evenly distributed and it only occurred in this one picture.


EOS 7D – ISO100 – 20 s – f/8 – 18 mm

Late summer meadow

September 4th, 2016 by Simon No comments »


EOS 7D – ISO400 – 1/1000 s – f/3.2 – 300mm


EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/6500 s – f/1.8 – 26mm


EOS 7D – ISO400 – 1/1250 s – f/3.2 – 300mm


EOS 7D – ISO400 – 1/1250 s – f/3.2 – 300mm

Real world experience with the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art

April 23rd, 2016 by Simon No comments »

Writing my first article about the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art lens was mostly motivated by the fact that the AF inconsistency was sooo frustrating. Then only one week later I dropped the camera (a first for me in 10 years of owning a DSLR) with the Sigma attached, damaging the rear barrel and destroying the main PCB. But hey, I already knew where to send it so some weeks and about 200€ later I got it back like new just before leaving for two weeks vacation in Sri Lanka.

Of course there was no time to check focus again or even take test shots so this journey was the real test to see if the lens can hold up to my expectations.

After going through over 800 pictures the situation is more or less unchanged

  • AF misses maybe 10-15% of all shots
  • when AF is off it is almost always completely off – more or less to either end of the focus scale
  • I found no pattern in the AF glitches, they seem to be more or less random
  • refocusing one or two times gets the AF to work correctly most of the time
  • Sharpness, contrast and color is absolutely amazing when focus is correct

All in all the lens was way more convenient to use for everyday shooting than I thought. Yes, the range may be a bit limited compared to a 17-50mm f/2.8  and it is far bigger and heavier. However the creative potential and amazing image quality at all apertures makes the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art a joy to use for me.

1835 Blog_IMG_7119

EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/2000 s – f/1.8 – 18mm

1835 Blog_IMG_6258

EOS 7D – ISO3200 – 1/200 s – f/1.8 – 20mm

1835 Blog_IMG_5331

EOS 7D – ISO800 – 1/60 s – f/1.8 – 18mm

1835 Blog_IMG_6017

EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/1600 s – f/1.8 – 18mm

1835 Blog_IMG_6163

EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/1250 s – f/1.8 – 18mm

Night sky over Brandenburg

January 5th, 2016 by Simon No comments »

Over new year we spent some days in Fürstenwerder north of Berlin. The population density is low and from midnight on most of the street lights get shut off so light pollution is much less than near big cities.

So one freezing cold and stormy night (-10°C/14°F) I took the camera and a flashlight and went out.


EOS 7D – ISO3200 – 10 s – f/1.8 – 18 mm


EOS 7D – ISO3200 – 8 s – f/1.8 – 18 mm


EOS 7D – ISO3200 – 8 s – f/1.8 – 18 mm


EOS 7D – ISO3200 – 10 s – f/1.8 – 19 mm

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art: a Story of love and despair

December 23rd, 2015 by Simon No comments »

Did you ever think that your standard 17-50 (or similar) lens has a too large zoom range, weighs too little and is too cheap? Surely not. So why would you want to have a massive 18-35mm lens that costs around 750€? Sigma must be nuts to develop such a thing!


Two reasons: aperture and image quality. It’s that simple.

Long Story first – skip if you just need technical details.

I first tried the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art in Dublin on holiday. After a few test shots the autofocus appeared to be a hit and miss so I played it safe and decided not to buy abroad.

Back home I went to my local dealer and spent a long time trying their only remaining model. The result was so-so even on a 7DmkII and 750D that they had on display. But as they had all lenses on sale for 10% off that day I jumped right in and bought it.

What do you do with a new lens? You walk around and shoot random things, learning how your new toy behaves in the real world. Disillusion came quick as I realized that the focus was off at many distances that I had not tried in the shop.

So I went back, ready to get an instant refund. The good man at the shop however convinced me to give it one more chance and let him send it to Sigma for calibration. So after an agonizing 6 weeks (they forgot to send the proof of purchase) I went back, tried it and oh wonder suddenly it was focusing perfectly at the distances that were terrible before.

Some days later I had time for some testing and instantly I regretted ever getting the lens. The focus was now way off at the distances that were perfect before! This time I decided to contact Sigma directly via eMail. The response was quick and nice and they asked me to send the lens and camera in again promising to return all before christmas. I got a for for a free return with DHL and off it went.

Wondering how long this may take I was extremely surprised when 3 days later I got a packet back.

The result? Oh well… I was SO frustrated to find that trying to focus on my self-printed test target was horrible at 18mm and a distance of around 1-1.5m.

What now? An email with no so happy words was prepared to go, I went through loads of websites where people seemed to have similar problems but they solved them by calibrating the lens themselves with the Sigma USB dock. But I had the lens calibrated twice by Sigma themselves! Why should I invest even more time and money to make the lens work?

Oh well, the dock can be returned and I really want the lens to work so I will just give it one last try.

Hours of adjusting and testing later all focal lengths were adjusted at all possible distances. Especially the infinity setting had to be heavily corrected.

And the result of all this? Let me put it like this: The focus itself is far from perfect and hopefully Sigma can improve it via firmware update in the future but in the real world it works really fine. Not always perfect but most of the time.

Now let’s get to the technical details.

Technical details

The lens is a massive piece of equipment. Compared to the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 it not only looks huge. It’s almost twice the weight (852g according to the kitchen scales) and with the hood off it is as long as the Tamron with the hood on.


The filter diameter is reasonable at 72mm and there is no restriction for using filters like bulbous front elements or similar.

What stands out even more than the size and weight is the high quality feel when holding it. Sigma has really outdone themselves with the latest lens design of the Art-Line lenses. The Plastic feels almost like metal, focus and zoom rings are perfectly damped, the AF switch clicks nicely and of course there is no wobble at all.

One thing that I always hated about Canon lenses is the lack of accessories that come with the lens as standard. On non-L lenses you don’t even get a lens hood as standard and bags are not nice and padded but mostly simple pouches. Sigma supplies you for free with a nice bag and a lens hood that is unparalleled (as far as my knowledge of lenses goes).

There is no movement when zooming or focusing. Everything happens inside the barrel.

Enough for the external view. How does it look on the inside? The optical construction is very complex with 17 elements in 12 groups. That’s of course what makes the lens heavy and big.

Chromatic aberrations are low, vignetting is well controlled, distortion is ok and not really relevant in everyday situations, AF is really fast, coma is good.

What is most important: the images produced are incredibly sharp at all apertures and focal lengths. Images at f/1.8 are already sharp and contrasty across the frame. Stopping down improves corner quality and overall detail a bit but mainly it reduces vignetting.


18mm@f/1.8, 100% crop, no adjustments


18mm@f/4, 100%crop, no adjustments

One important aspect of large aperture lenses is the background blur or “bokeh”. The question whether the quality is good or not depends very much on your own taste.


EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/1000 s – f/1.8 – 18 mm


EOS 7D – ISO100 – 1/1600 s – f/2 – 18 mm

For me the Bokeh is very nice but not perfect. Highlight are nice and circular but not as creamy as you are used to from f/1.8 prime lenses.


Sigma has created a unique lens with the 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art that makes things possible that one could only dream of before. 18mm f/1.8 lenses were not even available as prime lenses and they managed to put in zoom and astounding image quality as well!

Optics and build quality are up to highest standards and combined with the reasonable price (around 700€ in Germany in November 2015) the value for money is amazing.

The focus issues are something to worry especially for those who do not want to invest hours of work for calibration. Especially the fact that two trips to the Sigma service center did not really help makes me wonder what they are doing. Better calculate 40€ for the USB dock when looking for the lens.

So in the end there is a lot of good stuff but it is hard to overlook the focus calibration issue.

Other reviews